GHSA-JF5H-CF95-W759

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-17 00:16 – Updated: 2022-06-17 00:16
VLAI?
Summary
Optional `Deserialize` implementations lacking validation
Details

When activating the non-default feature serialize, most structs implement serde::Deserialize without sufficient validation. This allows breaking invariants in safe code, leading to:

  • Undefined behavior in as_string() methods (which use std::str::from_utf8_unchecked() internally).
  • Panics due to failed assertions.

See https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/43.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "raw-cpuid"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-17T00:16:24Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "When activating the non-default feature `serialize`, most structs implement\n`serde::Deserialize` without sufficient validation. This allows breaking\ninvariants in safe code, leading to:\n\n* Undefined behavior in `as_string()` methods (which use\n  `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked()` internally).\n* Panics due to failed assertions.\n\nSee https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/43.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-jf5h-cf95-w759",
  "modified": "2022-06-17T00:16:24Z",
  "published": "2022-06-17T00:16:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/43"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0089.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Optional `Deserialize` implementations lacking validation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…