ghsa-jcww-gc65-wfhf
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: don't allow the same type rq_qos add more than once
In our test of iocost, we encountered some list add/del corruptions of inner_walk list in ioc_timer_fn.
The reason can be described as follows:
cpu 0 cpu 1 ioc_qos_write ioc_qos_write
ioc = q_to_ioc(queue); if (!ioc) { ioc = kzalloc(); ioc = q_to_ioc(queue); if (!ioc) { ioc = kzalloc(); ... rq_qos_add(q, rqos); } ... rq_qos_add(q, rqos); ... }
When the io.cost.qos file is written by two cpus concurrently, rq_qos may be added to one disk twice. In that case, there will be two iocs enabled and running on one disk. They own different iocgs on their active list. In the ioc_timer_fn function, because of the iocgs from two iocs have the same root iocg, the root iocg's walk_list may be overwritten by each other and this leads to list add/del corruptions in building or destroying the inner_walk list.
And so far, the blk-rq-qos framework works in case that one instance for one type rq_qos per queue by default. This patch make this explicit and also fix the crash above.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-50086"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-18T11:15:37Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblock: don\u0027t allow the same type rq_qos add more than once\n\nIn our test of iocost, we encountered some list add/del corruptions of\ninner_walk list in ioc_timer_fn.\n\nThe reason can be described as follows:\n\ncpu 0\t\t\t\t\tcpu 1\nioc_qos_write\t\t\t\tioc_qos_write\n\nioc = q_to_ioc(queue);\nif (!ioc) {\n ioc = kzalloc();\n\t\t\t\t\tioc = q_to_ioc(queue);\n\t\t\t\t\tif (!ioc) {\n\t\t\t\t\t\tioc = kzalloc();\n\t\t\t\t\t\t...\n\t\t\t\t\t\trq_qos_add(q, rqos);\n\t\t\t\t\t}\n ...\n rq_qos_add(q, rqos);\n ...\n}\n\nWhen the io.cost.qos file is written by two cpus concurrently, rq_qos may\nbe added to one disk twice. In that case, there will be two iocs enabled\nand running on one disk. They own different iocgs on their active list. In\nthe ioc_timer_fn function, because of the iocgs from two iocs have the\nsame root iocg, the root iocg\u0027s walk_list may be overwritten by each other\nand this leads to list add/del corruptions in building or destroying the\ninner_walk list.\n\nAnd so far, the blk-rq-qos framework works in case that one instance for\none type rq_qos per queue by default. This patch make this explicit and\nalso fix the crash above.",
"id": "GHSA-jcww-gc65-wfhf",
"modified": "2025-06-18T12:30:47Z",
"published": "2025-06-18T12:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50086"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08ef66e800a85afc6b54cb95841f6502627eee2e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b7f5d7a4d2a72ad9de04ab8ccba2a31904aa638"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c9bb1acd1d103a3070b2126870eb52761d606ce"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14a6e2eb7df5c7897c15b109cba29ab0c4a791b6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.