ghsa-jcfm-9hmq-23cj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:27
Modified
2022-05-14 01:27
Severity ?
Details
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in System Server in Android 6.x before 2016-11-01 and 7.0 before 2016-11-01 could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of a privileged process. This issue is rated as High because it could be used to gain local access to elevated capabilities, which are not normally accessible to a third-party application. Android ID: A-31350622.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-6707" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-11-25T16:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An elevation of privilege vulnerability in System Server in Android 6.x before 2016-11-01 and 7.0 before 2016-11-01 could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of a privileged process. This issue is rated as High because it could be used to gain local access to elevated capabilities, which are not normally accessible to a third-party application. Android ID: A-31350622.", "id": "GHSA-jcfm-9hmq-23cj", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:27:56Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:27:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6707" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=928" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2016/12/bitunmap-attacking-android-ashmem.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2016-11-01.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40874" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94164" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.