ghsa-jc3q-v54h-r8hh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-15 15:31
Modified
2025-09-15 15:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: drop redundant sched job cleanup when cs is aborted
Once command submission failed due to userptr invalidation in amdgpu_cs_submit, legacy code will perform cleanup of scheduler job. However, it's not needed at all, as former commit has integrated job cleanup stuff into amdgpu_job_free. Otherwise, because of double free, a NULL pointer dereference will occur in such scenario.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2457
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-53228" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T15:15:49Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: drop redundant sched job cleanup when cs is aborted\n\nOnce command submission failed due to userptr invalidation in\namdgpu_cs_submit, legacy code will perform cleanup of scheduler\njob. However, it\u0027s not needed at all, as former commit has integrated\njob cleanup stuff into amdgpu_job_free. Otherwise, because of double\nfree, a NULL pointer dereference will occur in such scenario.\n\nBug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2457", "id": "GHSA-jc3q-v54h-r8hh", "modified": "2025-09-15T15:31:29Z", "published": "2025-09-15T15:31:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53228" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1253685f0d3eb3eab0bfc4bf15ab341a5f3da0c8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1564d4b105ae535eb3183ecaaa987685b20a888" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec02a29c3c2ef8ad3e15a0e3f96b99a00e5d97b4" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…