ghsa-j8qh-3xrq-c825
Vulnerability from github
Impact
The implementation of the OneHot
TFLite operator is vulnerable to a division by zero error:
cc
int prefix_dim_size = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < op_context.axis; ++i) {
prefix_dim_size *= op_context.indices->dims->data[i];
}
const int suffix_dim_size = NumElements(op_context.indices) / prefix_dim_size;
An attacker can craft a model such that at least one of the dimensions of indices
would be 0. In turn, the prefix_dim_size
value would become 0.
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 3ebedd7e345453d68e279cfc3e4072648e5e12e5.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.2.0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.3.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.4.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-cpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-cpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.2.0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-cpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.3.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-cpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.4.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-gpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-gpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.2.0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-gpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.3.0" }, { "fixed": "2.3.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "tensorflow-gpu" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.4.0" }, { "fixed": "2.4.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-29600" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-369" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-17T22:31:41Z", "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "### Impact\nThe implementation of the `OneHot` TFLite operator is [vulnerable to a division by zero error](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/f61c57bd425878be108ec787f4d96390579fb83e/tensorflow/lite/kernels/one_hot.cc#L68-L72):\n\n```cc\nint prefix_dim_size = 1;\nfor (int i = 0; i \u003c op_context.axis; ++i) {\n prefix_dim_size *= op_context.indices-\u003edims-\u003edata[i];\n}\nconst int suffix_dim_size = NumElements(op_context.indices) / prefix_dim_size;\n```\n\nAn attacker can craft a model such that at least one of the dimensions of `indices` would be 0. In turn, the `prefix_dim_size` value would become 0.\n\n### Patches\nWe have patched the issue in GitHub commit [3ebedd7e345453d68e279cfc3e4072648e5e12e5](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3ebedd7e345453d68e279cfc3e4072648e5e12e5).\n\nThe fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.\n\n### For more information\nPlease consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.\n\n### Attribution\nThis vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.", "id": "GHSA-j8qh-3xrq-c825", "modified": "2024-11-13T16:07:47Z", "published": "2021-05-21T14:28:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-j8qh-3xrq-c825" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29600" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/3ebedd7e345453d68e279cfc3e4072648e5e12e5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-cpu/PYSEC-2021-528.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-gpu/PYSEC-2021-726.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow/PYSEC-2021-237.yaml" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/f61c57bd425878be108ec787f4d96390579fb83e/tensorflow/lite/kernels/one_hot.cc#L68-L72" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" }, { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ], "summary": "Division by zero in TFLite\u0027s implementation of `OneHot`" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.