github - ghsa-j86q-w3f9-5q6c

ghsa-j86q-w3f9-5q6c

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-05-17 04:11

Modified

2024-03-21 03:33

Details

** DISPUTED ** The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says "The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack."

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2015-1571",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2015-02-10T20:59:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "** DISPUTED ** The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key.  NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says \"The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack.\"",
   id: "GHSA-j86q-w3f9-5q6c",
   modified: "2024-03-21T03:33:11Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T04:11:07Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1571",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}

cve-2015-1571

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2015-02-10 20:00

Modified

2024-08-06 04:47

Severity ?

Summary

The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says "The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125	mailing-list, x_refsource_FULLDISC
	http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-06T04:47:17.118Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  name: "20150129 Fortinet FortiOS Multiple Vulnerabilities",
                  tags: [
                     "mailing-list",
                     "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_MISC",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_MISC",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "n/a",
               vendor: "n/a",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "n/a",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         datePublic: "2015-01-29T00:00:00",
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key.  NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says \"The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack.",
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     description: "n/a",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "text",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2015-07-15T16:57:01",
            orgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
            shortName: "mitre",
         },
         references: [
            {
               name: "20150129 Fortinet FortiOS Multiple Vulnerabilities",
               tags: [
                  "mailing-list",
                  "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
               ],
               url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
            },
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
            },
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
            },
         ],
         tags: [
            "disputed",
         ],
         x_legacyV4Record: {
            CVE_data_meta: {
               ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org",
               ID: "CVE-2015-1571",
               STATE: "PUBLIC",
            },
            affects: {
               vendor: {
                  vendor_data: [
                     {
                        product: {
                           product_data: [
                              {
                                 product_name: "n/a",
                                 version: {
                                    version_data: [
                                       {
                                          version_value: "n/a",
                                       },
                                    ],
                                 },
                              },
                           ],
                        },
                        vendor_name: "n/a",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            },
            data_format: "MITRE",
            data_type: "CVE",
            data_version: "4.0",
            description: {
               description_data: [
                  {
                     lang: "eng",
                     value: "** DISPUTED ** The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key.  NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says \"The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack.\"",
                  },
               ],
            },
            problemtype: {
               problemtype_data: [
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "eng",
                           value: "n/a",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
               ],
            },
            references: {
               reference_data: [
                  {
                     name: "20150129 Fortinet FortiOS Multiple Vulnerabilities",
                     refsource: "FULLDISC",
                     url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
                     refsource: "MISC",
                     url: "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
                     refsource: "MISC",
                     url: "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
      assignerShortName: "mitre",
      cveId: "CVE-2015-1571",
      datePublished: "2015-02-10T20:00:00",
      dateReserved: "2015-02-10T00:00:00",
      dateUpdated: "2024-08-06T04:47:17.118Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
}

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted