ghsa-j6hw-jr7w-8c5m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-21 09:31
Modified
2024-08-29 03:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: mac80211: fix initialization of rx->link and rx->link_sta

There are some codepaths that do not initialize rx->link_sta properly. This causes a crash in places which assume that rx->link_sta is valid if rx->sta is valid. One known instance is triggered by __ieee80211_rx_h_amsdu being called from fast-rx. It results in a crash like this one:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a8 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 506 Comm: mt76-usb-rx phy Tainted: G E 6.1.0-debian64x+1.7 #3 Hardware name: ZOTAC ZBOX-ID92/ZBOX-IQ01/ZBOX-ID92/ZBOX-IQ01, BIOS B220P007 05/21/2014 RIP: 0010:ieee80211_deliver_skb+0x62/0x1f0 [mac80211] Code: 00 48 89 04 24 e8 9e a7 c3 df 89 c0 48 03 1c c5 a0 ea 39 a1 4c 01 6b 08 48 ff 03 48 83 7d 28 00 74 11 48 8b 45 30 48 63 55 44 <48> 83 84 d0 a8 00 00 00 01 41 8b 86 c0 11 00 00 8d 50 fd 83 fa 01 RSP: 0018:ffff999040803b10 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffb9903f496480 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff999040803ce0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8d21828ac900 R13: 000000000000004a R14: ffff8d2198ed89c0 R15: ffff8d2198ed8000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d24afe80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000a8 CR3: 0000000429810002 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: __ieee80211_rx_h_amsdu+0x1b5/0x240 [mac80211] ? ieee80211_prepare_and_rx_handle+0xcdd/0x1320 [mac80211] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x3b/0xa0 ieee80211_prepare_and_rx_handle+0xcdd/0x1320 [mac80211] ? prepare_transfer+0x109/0x1a0 [xhci_hcd] ieee80211_rx_list+0xa80/0xda0 [mac80211] mt76_rx_complete+0x207/0x2e0 [mt76] mt76_rx_poll_complete+0x357/0x5a0 [mt76] mt76u_rx_worker+0x4f5/0x600 [mt76_usb] ? mt76_get_min_avg_rssi+0x140/0x140 [mt76] __mt76_worker_fn+0x50/0x80 [mt76] kthread+0xed/0x120 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Since the initialization of rx->link and rx->link_sta is rather convoluted and duplicated in many places, clean it up by using a helper function to set it.

[remove unnecessary rx->sta->sta.mlo check]

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-48876"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-21T07:15:04Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mac80211: fix initialization of rx-\u003elink and rx-\u003elink_sta\n\nThere are some codepaths that do not initialize rx-\u003elink_sta properly. This\ncauses a crash in places which assume that rx-\u003elink_sta is valid if rx-\u003esta\nis valid.\nOne known instance is triggered by __ieee80211_rx_h_amsdu being called from\nfast-rx. It results in a crash like this one:\n\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a8\n #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 506 Comm: mt76-usb-rx phy Tainted: G            E      6.1.0-debian64x+1.7 #3\n Hardware name: ZOTAC ZBOX-ID92/ZBOX-IQ01/ZBOX-ID92/ZBOX-IQ01, BIOS B220P007 05/21/2014\n RIP: 0010:ieee80211_deliver_skb+0x62/0x1f0 [mac80211]\n Code: 00 48 89 04 24 e8 9e a7 c3 df 89 c0 48 03 1c c5 a0 ea 39 a1 4c 01 6b 08 48 ff 03 48\n       83 7d 28 00 74 11 48 8b 45 30 48 63 55 44 \u003c48\u003e 83 84 d0 a8 00 00 00 01 41 8b 86 c0\n       11 00 00 8d 50 fd 83 fa 01\n RSP: 0018:ffff999040803b10 EFLAGS: 00010286\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffb9903f496480 RCX: 0000000000000000\n RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffff999040803ce0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8d21828ac900\n R13: 000000000000004a R14: ffff8d2198ed89c0 R15: ffff8d2198ed8000\n FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d24afe80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00000000000000a8 CR3: 0000000429810002 CR4: 00000000001706e0\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  __ieee80211_rx_h_amsdu+0x1b5/0x240 [mac80211]\n  ? ieee80211_prepare_and_rx_handle+0xcdd/0x1320 [mac80211]\n  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x3b/0xa0\n  ieee80211_prepare_and_rx_handle+0xcdd/0x1320 [mac80211]\n  ? prepare_transfer+0x109/0x1a0 [xhci_hcd]\n  ieee80211_rx_list+0xa80/0xda0 [mac80211]\n  mt76_rx_complete+0x207/0x2e0 [mt76]\n  mt76_rx_poll_complete+0x357/0x5a0 [mt76]\n  mt76u_rx_worker+0x4f5/0x600 [mt76_usb]\n  ? mt76_get_min_avg_rssi+0x140/0x140 [mt76]\n  __mt76_worker_fn+0x50/0x80 [mt76]\n  kthread+0xed/0x120\n  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20\n  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n\nSince the initialization of rx-\u003elink and rx-\u003elink_sta is rather convoluted\nand duplicated in many places, clean it up by using a helper function to\nset it.\n\n[remove unnecessary rx-\u003esta-\u003esta.mlo check]",
  "id": "GHSA-j6hw-jr7w-8c5m",
  "modified": "2024-08-29T03:30:48Z",
  "published": "2024-08-21T09:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48876"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a57c981d9f24d2bd89eaa76dc477e8ca252e22e8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e66b7920aa5ac5b1a1997a454004ba9246a3c005"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.