ghsa-j5qc-xcfm-cq6p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-18 15:31
Modified
2025-11-02 15:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()
Since cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also ef100_check_design_params() run before efx->net_dev is created; consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this point. Move those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37860"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-18T07:15:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()\n\nSince cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also\n ef100_check_design_params() run before efx-\u003enet_dev is created;\n consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this\n point.\nMove those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace\n netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.",
"id": "GHSA-j5qc-xcfm-cq6p",
"modified": "2025-11-02T15:30:12Z",
"published": "2025-04-18T15:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8241ecec1cdc6699ae197d52d58e76bddd995fa5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e56391011381d6d029da377a65ac314cb3d5def2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f21623b8446735b5e2ac5f8ee69b8743177d7b19"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…