ghsa-j38h-g479-cx9j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:19
Modified
2022-04-30 18:19
Details

KAME-derived implementations of IPsec on NetBSD 1.5.2, FreeBSD 4.5, and other operating systems, does not properly consult the Security Policy Database (SPD), which could cause a Security Gateway (SG) that does not use Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) to forward forged IPv4 packets.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0414"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-08-12T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "KAME-derived implementations of IPsec on NetBSD 1.5.2, FreeBSD 4.5, and other operating systems, does not properly consult the Security Policy Database (SPD), which could cause a Security Gateway (SG) that does not use Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) to forward forged IPv4 packets.",
  "id": "GHSA-j38h-g479-cx9j",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:19:10Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:19:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0414"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2002-q1/0057.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/CHANGELOG"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8416.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/5304"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/259598"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4224"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.