ghsa-j325-fpcg-5hqf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:51
Modified
2022-05-01 01:51
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the web tool for MySQL MaxDB before 7.5.00.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) an HTTP GET request with a long file parameter after a percent ("%") sign or (2) a long Lock-Token string to the WebDAV functionality, which is not properly handled by the getLockTokenHeader function in WDVHandler_CommonUtils.c.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-0684"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-04-25T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the web tool for MySQL MaxDB before 7.5.00.26 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) an HTTP GET request with a long file parameter after a percent (\"%\") sign or (2) a long Lock-Token string to the WebDAV functionality, which is not properly handled by the getLockTokenHeader function in WDVHandler_CommonUtils.c.",
  "id": "GHSA-j325-fpcg-5hqf",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:51:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:51:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0684"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/changes/changes_7.5.00.26.html#WebDAV"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=234\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=235\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13368"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…