ghsa-j2jm-9cr2-x48x
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling
Currently, mdadm support --revert-reshape to abort the reshape while reassembling, as the test 07revert-grow. However, following BUG_ON() can be triggerred by the test:
kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:6278!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
irq event stamp: 158985
CPU: 6 PID: 891 Comm: md0_reshape Not tainted 6.9.0-03335-g7592a0b0049a #94
RIP: 0010:reshape_request+0x3f1/0xe60
Call Trace:
Root cause is that --revert-reshape update the raid_disks from 5 to 4, while reshape position is still set, and after reassembling the array, reshape position will be read from super block, then during reshape the checking of 'writepos' that is caculated by old reshape position will fail.
Fix this panic the easy way first, by converting the BUG_ON() to WARN_ON(), and stop the reshape if checkings fail.
Noted that mdadm must fix --revert-shape as well, and probably md/raid should enhance metadata validation as well, however this means reassemble will fail and there must be user tools to fix the wrong metadata.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-43914" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-26T11:15:05Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling\n\nCurrently, mdadm support --revert-reshape to abort the reshape while\nreassembling, as the test 07revert-grow. However, following BUG_ON()\ncan be triggerred by the test:\n\nkernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:6278!\ninvalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nirq event stamp: 158985\nCPU: 6 PID: 891 Comm: md0_reshape Not tainted 6.9.0-03335-g7592a0b0049a #94\nRIP: 0010:reshape_request+0x3f1/0xe60\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n raid5_sync_request+0x43d/0x550\n md_do_sync+0xb7a/0x2110\n md_thread+0x294/0x2b0\n kthread+0x147/0x1c0\n ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nRoot cause is that --revert-reshape update the raid_disks from 5 to 4,\nwhile reshape position is still set, and after reassembling the array,\nreshape position will be read from super block, then during reshape the\nchecking of \u0027writepos\u0027 that is caculated by old reshape position will\nfail.\n\nFix this panic the easy way first, by converting the BUG_ON() to\nWARN_ON(), and stop the reshape if checkings fail.\n\nNoted that mdadm must fix --revert-shape as well, and probably md/raid\nshould enhance metadata validation as well, however this means\nreassemble will fail and there must be user tools to fix the wrong\nmetadata.", "id": "GHSA-j2jm-9cr2-x48x", "modified": "2024-09-05T18:30:51Z", "published": "2024-08-26T12:31:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43914" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c92f8c1c456d556f15cbf51667b385026b2e6a0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/305a5170dc5cf3d395bb4c4e9239bca6d0b54b49" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b33740c1750a39e046339ff9240e954f0156707" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4811d6e5d9f4090c3e0ff9890eb24077108046ab" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b33c468d543f6a83de2d61f09fec74b27e19fd2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/775a9ba16c9ffe98fe54ebf14e55d5660f2bf600" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf0ff69a42a3d2d46876d0514ecf13dffc516666" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c384dd4f1fb3b14a2fd199360701cc163ea88705" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.