ghsa-j2cm-xc9q-86w4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 00:59
Modified
2022-05-14 00:59
Severity ?
Details

FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains an Out-Of-Bounds Write of up to 4 bytes in function nsc_rle_decode() that results in a memory corruption and possibly even a remote code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-8788"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-11-29T18:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains an Out-Of-Bounds Write of up to 4 bytes in function nsc_rle_decode() that results in a memory corruption and possibly even a remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2cm-xc9q-86w4",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T00:59:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T00:59:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8788"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/d1112c279bd1a327e8e4d0b5f371458bf2579659"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0697"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/02/msg00015.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://research.checkpoint.com/reverse-rdp-attack-code-execution-on-rdp-clients"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3845-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3845-2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106938"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.