ghsa-hxrv-xxfr-vpw3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:10
Modified
2022-05-17 05:10
Details
tif_getimage.c in LibTIFF 3.9.0 and 3.9.2 on 64-bit platforms, as used in ImageMagick, does not properly perform vertical flips, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image, related to "downsampled OJPEG input."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-2233" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-07-02T12:43:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "tif_getimage.c in LibTIFF 3.9.0 and 3.9.2 on 64-bit platforms, as used in ImageMagick, does not properly perform vertical flips, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image, related to \"downsampled OJPEG input.\"", "id": "GHSA-hxrv-xxfr-vpw3", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:10:00Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:10:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2233" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-2233" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583081" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607198" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2207" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127731610612908\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40422" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50726" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024150" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v3.9.4.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.