ghsa-hvfc-r626-888m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2025-04-12 12:54
VLAI Severity ?
Details
PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /(((a\2)|(a)\g<-1>))/ pattern and related patterns with certain internal recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2327"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-12-02T01:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /(((a\\2)|(a*)\\g\u003c-1\u003e))*/ pattern and related patterns with certain internal recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.",
"id": "GHSA-hvfc-r626-888m",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:54:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:59:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2327"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1503"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-17252"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-VD-15-010"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74924"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…