ghsa-hv8v-8gq8-6q29
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:42
Modified
2022-05-14 02:42
Details
ISC BIND before 9.7.2-P2, when DNSSEC validation is enabled, does not properly handle certain bad signatures if multiple trust anchors exist for a single zone, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a DNS query.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-3762" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-10-05T22:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "ISC BIND before 9.7.2-P2, when DNSSEC validation is enabled, does not properly handle certain bad signatures if multiple trust anchors exist for a single zone, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a DNS query.", "id": "GHSA-hv8v-8gq8-6q29", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:42:51Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:42:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.2-P2/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.7.2-P2.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2011/000126.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100124923" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2130" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:253" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0976.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/516909/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45385" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0606" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.