ghsa-hrm2-xm5m-6mfh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:02
Modified
2022-05-01 18:02
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the process_sdp function in chan_sip.c of the SIP channel T.38 SDP parser in Asterisk before 1.4.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) T38FaxRateManagement or (2) T38FaxUdpEC SDP parameter in an SIP message, as demonstrated using SIP INVITE.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2293" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-04-26T20:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the process_sdp function in chan_sip.c of the SIP channel T.38 SDP parser in Asterisk before 1.4.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) T38FaxRateManagement or (2) T38FaxUdpEC SDP parameter in an SIP message, as demonstrated using SIP INVITE.", "id": "GHSA-hrm2-xm5m-6mfh", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:02:16Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:02:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2293" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33895" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24977" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2645" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.asterisk.org/files/ASA-2007-010.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/35368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/466883/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/472804/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23648" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017951" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018337" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1534" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.