ghsa-hrfc-mjc4-cv8f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:46
Modified
2022-08-06 00:00
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
There's a flaw in the zeromq server in versions before 4.3.3 in src/decoder_allocators.hpp. The decoder static allocator could have its sized changed, but the buffer would remain the same as it is a static buffer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker who sends a crafted request to the zeromq server could trigger a buffer overflow WRITE of arbitrary data if CURVE/ZAP authentication is not enabled. The greatest impact of this flaw is to application availability, data integrity, and confidentiality.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-20235" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120", "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-04-01T14:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "There\u0027s a flaw in the zeromq server in versions before 4.3.3 in src/decoder_allocators.hpp. The decoder static allocator could have its sized changed, but the buffer would remain the same as it is a static buffer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker who sends a crafted request to the zeromq server could trigger a buffer overflow WRITE of arbitrary data if CURVE/ZAP authentication is not enabled. The greatest impact of this flaw is to application availability, data integrity, and confidentiality.", "id": "GHSA-hrfc-mjc4-cv8f", "modified": "2022-08-06T00:00:40Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:46:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/security/advisories/GHSA-fc3w-qxf5-7hp6" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20235" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921983" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…