ghsa-hqjw-x4mf-w7v2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:46
Modified
2022-05-17 03:46
Details

GNU Wget 1.12 and earlier uses a server-provided filename instead of the original URL to determine the destination filename of a download, which allows remote servers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a 3xx redirect to a URL with a .wgetrc filename followed by a 3xx redirect to a URL with a crafted filename, and possibly execute arbitrary code as a consequence of writing to a dotfile in a home directory.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2010-2252",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2010-07-06T17:17:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "GNU Wget 1.12 and earlier uses a server-provided filename instead of the original URL to determine the destination filename of a download, which allows remote servers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a 3xx redirect to a URL with a .wgetrc filename followed by a 3xx redirect to a URL with a crafted filename, and possibly execute arbitrary code as a consequence of writing to a dotfile in a home directory.",
   id: "GHSA-hqjw-x4mf-w7v2",
   modified: "2022-05-17T03:46:39Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T03:46:39Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2252",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591580",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602797",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2010-05/msg00023.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2010-05/msg00031.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2010-05/msg00032.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2010-05/msg00033.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2010-05/msg00034.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127411372529485&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127412569216380&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127416905831994&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127422615924593&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127427572721591&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127432968701342&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127441275821210&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127611288927500&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0151.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2010-001.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65722",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.