ghsa-hj9v-2jmr-qwcf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:55
Modified
2025-04-12 12:46
Details
The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-0207", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-03-19T22:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server.", id: "GHSA-hj9v-2jmr-qwcf", modified: "2025-04-12T12:46:19Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:55:48Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0207", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa92", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202351", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=819418110b6fff4a7b96f01a5d68f71df3e3b736", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=819418110b6fff4a7b96f01a5d68f71df3e3b736", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10110", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-11", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73229", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031929", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.