ghsa-hcfm-4g95-m8qp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-01-07 12:30
Modified
2025-01-07 12:30
Severity ?
Details
The MIPL WC Multisite Sync plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5 via the 'mipl_wc_sync_download_log' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-12152" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-22" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-07T10:15:06Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The MIPL WC Multisite Sync plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5 via the \u0027mipl_wc_sync_download_log\u0027 action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information.", "id": "GHSA-hcfm-4g95-m8qp", "modified": "2025-01-07T12:30:58Z", "published": "2025-01-07T12:30:58Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12152" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3215735%40mipl-wc-multisite-sync\u0026new=3215735%40mipl-wc-multisite-sync\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3216574%40mipl-wc-multisite-sync\u0026new=3216574%40mipl-wc-multisite-sync\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/575d1e24-d23d-4589-bb71-f52efec1ac58?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.