ghsa-h6p5-jr3p-xjfg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-09 09:33
Modified
2025-11-12 21:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ovl: don't allow datadir only
In theory overlayfs could support upper layer directly referring to a data layer, but there's no current use case for this.
Originally, when data-only layers were introduced, this wasn't allowed, only introduced by the "datadir+" feature, but without actually handling this case, resulting in an Oops.
Fix by disallowing datadir without lowerdir.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37863"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-09T07:16:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\novl: don\u0027t allow datadir only\n\nIn theory overlayfs could support upper layer directly referring to a data\nlayer, but there\u0027s no current use case for this.\n\nOriginally, when data-only layers were introduced, this wasn\u0027t allowed,\nonly introduced by the \"datadir+\" feature, but without actually handling\nthis case, resulting in an Oops.\n\nFix by disallowing datadir without lowerdir.",
"id": "GHSA-h6p5-jr3p-xjfg",
"modified": "2025-11-12T21:31:02Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T09:33:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37863"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0874b629f65320778e7e3e206177770666d9db18"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21d2ffb0e9838a175064c22f3a9de97d1f56f27d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9e3579213ba648fa23f780e8d53e99011c62331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb3a04a8516ee9b5174379306f94279fc90424c4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…