ghsa-h69g-x235-8mrr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:01
Modified
2022-05-01 02:01
Details
** DISPUTED ** JavaMail API 1.1.3 through 1.3, as used by Apache Tomcat 5.0.16, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the argument to the Download parameter. NOTE: Sun and Apache dispute this issue. Sun states: "The report makes references to source code and files that do not exist in the mentioned products."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2005-1754", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "** DISPUTED ** JavaMail API 1.1.3 through 1.3, as used by Apache Tomcat 5.0.16, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the argument to the Download parameter. NOTE: Sun and Apache dispute this issue. Sun states: \"The report makes references to source code and files that do not exist in the mentioned products.\"", id: "GHSA-h69g-x235-8mrr", modified: "2022-05-01T02:01:41Z", published: "2022-05-01T02:01:41Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1754", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=111697083812367&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13753", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.