ghsa-h45x-9jw8-5x6p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:26
Modified
2022-05-24 17:26
Details

The Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) controller implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.0 through 4.2 (for ESP32 devices) returns the wrong number of completed BLE packets and triggers a reachable assertion on the host stack when receiving a packet with an MIC failure. An attacker within radio range can silently trigger the assertion (which disables the target's BLE stack) by sending a crafted sequence of BLE packets.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-13595"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-08-31T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) controller implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.0 through 4.2 (for ESP32 devices) returns the wrong number of completed BLE packets and triggers a reachable assertion on the host stack when receiving a packet with an MIC failure. An attacker within radio range can silently trigger the assertion (which disables the target\u0027s BLE stack) by sending a crafted sequence of BLE packets.",
  "id": "GHSA-h45x-9jw8-5x6p",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:26:58Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:26:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13595"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://asset-group.github.io/cves.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://asset-group.github.io/disclosures/sweyntooth"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/espressif/esp32-bt-lib"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.