ghsa-gv9g-ccx2-9xj9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-10 21:31
Modified
2025-03-10 21:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Protect memory leak for NPIV ports sending PLOGI_RJT
There is a potential memory leak in lpfc_ignore_els_cmpl() and lpfc_els_rsp_reject() that was allocated from NPIV PLOGI_RJT (lpfc_rcv_plogi()'s login_mbox).
Check if cmdiocb->context_un.mbox was allocated in lpfc_ignore_els_cmpl(), and then free it back to phba->mbox_mem_pool along with mbox->ctx_buf for service parameters.
For lpfc_els_rsp_reject() failure, free both the ctx_buf for service parameters and the login_mbox.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-49534" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-401" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:29Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Protect memory leak for NPIV ports sending PLOGI_RJT\n\nThere is a potential memory leak in lpfc_ignore_els_cmpl() and\nlpfc_els_rsp_reject() that was allocated from NPIV PLOGI_RJT\n(lpfc_rcv_plogi()\u0027s login_mbox).\n\nCheck if cmdiocb-\u003econtext_un.mbox was allocated in lpfc_ignore_els_cmpl(),\nand then free it back to phba-\u003embox_mem_pool along with mbox-\u003ectx_buf for\nservice parameters.\n\nFor lpfc_els_rsp_reject() failure, free both the ctx_buf for service\nparameters and the login_mbox.", "id": "GHSA-gv9g-ccx2-9xj9", "modified": "2025-03-10T21:31:09Z", "published": "2025-03-10T21:31:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49534" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/672d1cb40551ea9c95efad43ab6d45e4ab4e015f" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c00df0f34a6d5e14da379f96ea67e501ce67b002" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…