ghsa-gpgf-w78r-4pvj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-11-22 03:30
Modified
2024-03-27 18:32
Severity ?
Details
In libarchive 3.6.1, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference or, in some cases, even arbitrary code execution.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-36227" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-22T02:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "In libarchive 3.6.1, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference or, in some cases, even arbitrary code execution.", "id": "GHSA-gpgf-w78r-4pvj", "modified": "2024-03-27T18:32:38Z", "published": "2022-11-22T03:30:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36227" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/1754" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/882521" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/blob/v3.0.0a/libarchive/archive_write.c#L215" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00034.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V67OO2UUQAUJS3IK4JZPF6F3LUCBU6IS" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V67OO2UUQAUJS3IK4JZPF6F3LUCBU6IS" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-14" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.