ghsa-gp8f-8m3g-qvj9
Vulnerability from github
8.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Impact
By sending a crafted HTTP request, it is possible to poison the cache of a non-dynamic server-side rendered route in the pages router (this does not affect the app router). When this crafted request is sent it could coerce Next.js to cache a route that is meant to not be cached and send a Cache-Control: s-maxage=1, stale-while-revalidate
header which some upstream CDNs may cache as well.
To be potentially affected all of the following must apply:
- Next.js between 13.5.1 and 14.2.9
- Using pages router
- Using non-dynamic server-side rendered routes e.g.
pages/dashboard.tsx
notpages/blog/[slug].tsx
The below configurations are unaffected:
- Deployments using only app router
- Deployments on Vercel are not affected
Patches
This vulnerability was resolved in Next.js v13.5.7, v14.2.10, and later. We recommend upgrading regardless of whether you can reproduce the issue or not.
Workarounds
There are no official or recommended workarounds for this issue, we recommend that users patch to a safe version.
Credits
- Allam Rachid (zhero_)
- Henry Chen
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "next" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "13.5.1" }, { "fixed": "13.5.7" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "next" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "14.0.0" }, { "fixed": "14.2.10" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-46982" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-349", "CWE-639" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-17T21:58:09Z", "nvd_published_at": "2024-09-17T22:15:02Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "### Impact\n\nBy sending a crafted HTTP request, it is possible to poison the cache of a non-dynamic server-side rendered route in the pages router (this does not affect the app router). When this crafted request is sent it could coerce Next.js to cache a route that is meant to not be cached and send a `Cache-Control: s-maxage=1, stale-while-revalidate` header which some upstream CDNs may cache as well. \n\nTo be potentially affected all of the following must apply: \n\n- Next.js between 13.5.1 and 14.2.9\n- Using pages router\n- Using non-dynamic server-side rendered routes e.g. `pages/dashboard.tsx` not `pages/blog/[slug].tsx`\n\nThe below configurations are unaffected:\n\n- Deployments using only app router\n- Deployments on [Vercel](https://vercel.com/) are not affected\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThis vulnerability was resolved in Next.js v13.5.7, v14.2.10, and later. We recommend upgrading regardless of whether you can reproduce the issue or not.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no official or recommended workarounds for this issue, we recommend that users patch to a safe version.\n\n#### Credits\n\n- Allam Rachid (zhero_)\n- Henry Chen", "id": "GHSA-gp8f-8m3g-qvj9", "modified": "2024-09-18T14:28:54Z", "published": "2024-09-17T21:58:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-gp8f-8m3g-qvj9" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46982" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/7ed7f125e07ef0517a331009ed7e32691ba403d3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/bd164d53af259c05f1ab434004bcfdd3837d7cda" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" }, { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ], "summary": "Next.js Cache Poisoning" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.