ghsa-g9vp-vrrf-jgjx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:22
Modified
2022-05-17 01:22
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The SIP implementation in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su5, 8.x before 8.5(1)su4, and 8.6 before 8.6(2a)su1; Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.2; and Cisco IOS XE 3.3.xSG before 3.3.1SG, 3.4.xS, and 3.5.xS allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash or device reload) via a crafted SIP message containing an SDP session description, aka Bug IDs CSCtw66721, CSCtj33003, and CSCtw84664.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3949" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-27T00:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The SIP implementation in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su5, 8.x before 8.5(1)su4, and 8.6 before 8.6(2a)su1; Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.2; and Cisco IOS XE 3.3.xSG before 3.3.1SG, 3.4.xS, and 3.5.xS allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash or device reload) via a crafted SIP message containing an SDP session description, aka Bug IDs CSCtw66721, CSCtj33003, and CSCtw84664.", "id": "GHSA-g9vp-vrrf-jgjx", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:22:52Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:22:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3949" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/85816" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50774" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120926-cucm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120926-sip" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55697" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…