ghsa-g9p6-4rgq-hjvp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:51
Modified
2022-05-01 01:51
Details
ptrace in Linux kernel 2.6.8.1 does not properly verify addresses on the amd64 platform, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (kernel crash).
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2005-0756", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2005-06-08T04:00:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "ptrace in Linux kernel 2.6.8.1 does not properly verify addresses on the amd64 platform, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (kernel crash).", id: "GHSA-g9p6-4rgq-hjvp", modified: "2022-05-01T01:51:48Z", published: "2022-05-01T01:51:48Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0756", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11119", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/137-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/17002", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/17073", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/18056", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/18059", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-921", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-922", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-514.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427980/100/0/threaded", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/428058/100/0/threaded", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13891", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1878", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.