ghsa-g7jr-3gjx-fr4f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:40
Modified
2024-03-21 03:33
Details

** DISPUTED ** Citrix XenMobile Server before 10.5.0.24 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger HTTP 302 redirections via vectors involving the HTTP Host header and a cached page. NOTE: the vendor reports "our internal analysis of this issue concluded that this was not a valid vulnerability" because an exploitation scenario would involve a man-in-the-middle attack against a TLS session.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-6877"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-05-05T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED ** Citrix XenMobile Server before 10.5.0.24 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger HTTP 302 redirections via vectors involving the HTTP Host header and a cached page.  NOTE: the vendor reports \"our internal analysis of this issue concluded that this was not a valid vulnerability\" because an exploitation scenario would involve a man-in-the-middle attack against a TLS session.",
  "id": "GHSA-g7jr-3gjx-fr4f",
  "modified": "2024-03-21T03:33:13Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:40:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6877"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.solutionary.com/threat-intelligence/vulnerability-disclosures/2017/03/citrix-xenmobile-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98341"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…