ghsa-fw6x-jw7v-xjwh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:03
Modified
2022-05-17 01:03
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the CDrawPoly::Serialize function in fxscover.exe in Microsoft Windows Fax Services Cover Page Editor 5.2 r2 in Windows XP Professional SP3, Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition SP2, and Windows 7 Professional allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long record in a Fax Cover Page (.cov) file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-4701" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-01-20T19:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the CDrawPoly::Serialize function in fxscover.exe in Microsoft Windows Fax Services Cover Page Editor 5.2 r2 in Windows XP Professional SP3, Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition SP2, and Windows 7 Professional allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long record in a Fax Cover Page (.cov) file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.", "id": "GHSA-fw6x-jw7v-xjwh", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:03:03Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:03:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4701" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12689" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_cov_bof.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42747" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15839" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024925" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA11-102A.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.