ghsa-fv65-pvq4-xv26
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:13
Modified
2022-05-13 01:13
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the tsc210x_load function in hw/input/tsc210x.c in QEMU before 1.7.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) precision, (2) nextprecision, (3) function, or (4) nextfunction value in a savevm image.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-4539"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-11-04T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the tsc210x_load function in hw/input/tsc210x.c in QEMU before 1.7.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) precision, (2) nextprecision, (3) function, or (4) nextfunction value in a savevm image.",
  "id": "GHSA-fv65-pvq4-xv26",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:13:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:13:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4539"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=5193be3be35f29a35bc465036cd64ad60d43385f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=5193be3be35f29a35bc465036cd64ad60d43385f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-May/133345.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-12/msg00394.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2014-07/msg00187.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.