ghsa-fphp-jmfp-4vj9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:27
Modified
2022-05-14 01:27
Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the gdImageWebpCtx function in gd_webp.c in the GD Graphics Library (aka libgd) through 2.2.3, as used in PHP through 7.0.11, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted imagewebp and imagedestroy calls.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-7568", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-190", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-09-28T20:59:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "Integer overflow in the gdImageWebpCtx function in gd_webp.c in the GD Graphics Library (aka libgd) through 2.2.3, as used in PHP through 7.0.11, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted imagewebp and imagedestroy calls.", id: "GHSA-fphp-jmfp-4vj9", modified: "2022-05-14T01:27:55Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:27:55Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7568", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/308", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/libgd/libgd/commit/40bec0f38f50e8510f5bb71a82f516d46facde03", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/c18263e0e0769faee96a5d0ee04b750c442783c6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73003", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-09", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3693", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93184", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.