ghsa-fjwx-29fr-83hw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:21
Modified
2022-05-14 01:21
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
keepalived 2.0.8 didn't check for existing plain files when writing data to a temporary file upon a call to PrintData or PrintStats. If a local attacker had previously created a file with the expected name (e.g., /tmp/keepalived.data or /tmp/keepalived.stats), with read access for the attacker and write access for the keepalived process, then this potentially leaked sensitive information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-19046"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-11-08T20:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "keepalived 2.0.8 didn\u0027t check for existing plain files when writing data to a temporary file upon a call to PrintData or PrintStats. If a local attacker had previously created a file with the expected name (e.g., /tmp/keepalived.data or /tmp/keepalived.stats), with read access for the attacker and write access for the keepalived process, then this potentially leaked sensitive information.",
"id": "GHSA-fjwx-29fr-83hw",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:21:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:21:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-19046"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/acassen/keepalived/issues/1048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015141"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…