ghsa-fjc3-r8f9-57p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:22
Modified
2022-05-01 07:22
Details
verify.c in GnuTLS before 1.4.4, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, does not properly handle excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field when generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents GnuTLS from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS, a variant of CVE-2006-4339.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-4790" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-09-14T19:07:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "verify.c in GnuTLS before 1.4.4, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, does not properly handle excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field when generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents GnuTLS from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS, a variant of CVE-2006-4339.", "id": "GHSA-fjc3-r8f9-57p5", "modified": "2022-05-01T07:22:04Z", "published": "2022-05-01T07:22:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4790" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28953" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9937" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001205.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001212.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21937" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21942" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21973" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22049" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22080" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22084" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22097" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22226" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22992" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200609-15.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016844" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102648-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102970-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2006-250.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1182" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:166" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_23_sr.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_10_ibmjava.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2006-0680.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20027" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-348-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3635" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3899" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2289" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.