ghsa-fjc3-r8f9-57p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:22
Modified
2022-05-01 07:22
VLAI Severity ?
Details
verify.c in GnuTLS before 1.4.4, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, does not properly handle excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field when generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents GnuTLS from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS, a variant of CVE-2006-4339.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-4790"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-09-14T19:07:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "verify.c in GnuTLS before 1.4.4, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, does not properly handle excess data in the digestAlgorithm.parameters field when generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents GnuTLS from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS, a variant of CVE-2006-4339.",
"id": "GHSA-fjc3-r8f9-57p5",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:22:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:22:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28953"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001205.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001212.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21942"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21973"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22049"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22080"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22084"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22097"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200609-15.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016844"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102648-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102970-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2006-250.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1182"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:166"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_23_sr.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_10_ibmjava.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2006-0680.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20027"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-348-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3635"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3899"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2289"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…