ghsa-fhvj-crp7-xfjw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:21
Modified
2022-05-24 19:21
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the "Display visual image directory" feature of the DescribeImage() function of the magick/describe.c file. One possible way to trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted MIFF format file with the verbose flag.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-16352"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-11-01T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the \"Display visual image directory\" feature of the DescribeImage() function of the magick/describe.c file. One possible way to trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted MIFF format file with the verbose flag.",
"id": "GHSA-fhvj-crp7-xfjw",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:21:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:21:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/3494"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4232-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43111"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://hg.graphicsmagick.org/hg/GraphicsMagick?cmd=changeset;node=7292230dd185"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101658"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…