ghsa-fhv9-q298-644g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:11
Modified
2022-05-17 03:11
Details
The sycc422_to_rgb function in fxcodec/codec/fx_codec_jpx_opj.cpp in PDFium, as used in Google Chrome before 40.0.2214.91, does not properly handle odd values of image width, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a crafted PDF document.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2014-7944", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-01-22T22:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The sycc422_to_rgb function in fxcodec/codec/fx_codec_jpx_opj.cpp in PDFium, as used in Google Chrome before 40.0.2214.91, does not properly handle odd values of image width, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a crafted PDF document.", id: "GHSA-fhv9-q298-644g", modified: "2022-05-17T03:11:27Z", published: "2022-05-17T03:11:27Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-7944", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=418881", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/6cf012af4954807255ce7cdb5b92a20f74d34e6d", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2015/01/stable-update.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00005.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0093.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62383", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62665", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201502-13.xml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72288", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031623", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.