ghsa-fhc6-fm3j-9cq8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-22 21:30
Modified
2025-09-22 21:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: atmel: Fix error handling in snd_proto_probe
The device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle() with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.
This function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path. And it will cause refcount leak in error paths. Fix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-49246"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: atmel: Fix error handling in snd_proto_probe\n\nThe device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle() with refcount\nincremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.\n\nThis function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path.\nAnd it will cause refcount leak in error paths.\nFix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.",
"id": "GHSA-fhc6-fm3j-9cq8",
"modified": "2025-09-22T21:30:15Z",
"published": "2025-09-22T21:30:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f517480d5888cd54487c5662ce4da95b30ad798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fa969cd8485031294f91fc7184399000cae6355"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0bfaf0544d08d093d6211d7ef8816fb0b5b6c75"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f32ac9bf5e3f594ef9bfedb410aebc98cf784e69"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…