ghsa-fgqw-4gx5-mwr9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:41
Modified
2022-05-01 17:41
Details

** DISPUTED ** Buffer overflow in the SMB_Connect_Server function in FreeRadius 1.1.3 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code related to the server desthost field of an SMB_Handle_Type instance. NOTE: the impact of this issue has been disputed by a reliable third party and the vendor, who states that exploitation is limited "only to local administrators who have write access to the server configuration files." CVE concurs with the dispute.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-0080"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-01-05T11:28:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED **  Buffer overflow in the SMB_Connect_Server function in FreeRadius 1.1.3 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code related to the server desthost field of an SMB_Handle_Type instance.  NOTE: the impact of this issue has been disputed by a reliable third party and the vendor, who states that exploitation is limited \"only to local administrators who have write access to the server configuration files.\"  CVE concurs with the dispute.",
  "id": "GHSA-fgqw-4gx5-mwr9",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T17:41:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:41:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-0080"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/31248"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/32082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017463"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2007-February/001304.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.freeradius.org/security.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/455678/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/455812/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.