ghsa-fg62-299p-x79j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:32
Modified
2022-05-13 01:32
Severity ?
Details
In stroke_socket.c in strongSwan before 5.6.3, a missing packet length check could allow a buffer underflow, which may lead to resource exhaustion and denial of service while reading from the socket.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-5388", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-124", "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-05-31T13:29:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "In stroke_socket.c in strongSwan before 5.6.3, a missing packet length check could allow a buffer underflow, which may lead to resource exhaustion and denial of service while reading from the socket.", id: "GHSA-fg62-299p-x79j", modified: "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5388", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.strongswan.org/?p=strongswan.git;a=commitdiff;h=0acd1ab4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-16", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3771-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4229", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00077.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00001.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00047.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172833/strongSwan-VPN-Charon-Server-Buffer-Overflow.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/338343", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104263", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.