ghsa-ffvj-mxf9-q65v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:13
Modified
2022-05-03 03:13
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the SendUidl in the POP3 capability for Mozilla before 1.7, Firefox before 0.9, and Thunderbird before 0.7, may allow remote POP3 mail servers to execute arbitrary code.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-0757" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2004-08-18T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the SendUidl in the POP3 capability for Mozilla before 1.7, Firefox before 0.9, and Thunderbird before 0.7, may allow remote POP3 mail servers to execute arbitrary code.", "id": "GHSA-ffvj-mxf9-q65v", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:13:08Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:13:08Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0757" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16869" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11042" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A3250" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229374" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=109900315219363\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/10856" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/561022" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#mozilla1.7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2004_36_mozilla.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-421.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15495" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.