ghsa-f8qw-pqjg-gpv2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-05 02:48
Modified
2025-04-11 04:07
Details
OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d does not properly perform signature verification for OCSP responses, which allows remote OCSP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid key.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2013-0166", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2013-02-08T19:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d does not properly perform signature verification for OCSP responses, which allows remote OCSP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid key.", id: "GHSA-f8qw-pqjg-gpv2", modified: "2025-04-11T04:07:17Z", published: "2022-05-05T02:48:30Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0166", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908052", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18754", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19081", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19360", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19487", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-c03883001", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=62e4506a7d4cec1c8e1ff687f6b220f6a62a57c7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=66e8211c0b1347970096e04b18aa52567c325200", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ebc71865f0506a293242bd4aec97cdc7a8ef24b0", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=62e4506a7d4cec1c8e1ff687f6b220f6a62a57c7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=66e8211c0b1347970096e04b18aa52567c325200", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=ebc71865f0506a293242bd4aec97cdc7a8ef24b0", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136396549913849&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136432043316835&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137545771702053&w=2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0782.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0783.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0833.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/53623", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/55108", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/55139", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5880", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2621", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/737740", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20130204.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAHXG", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.