ghsa-f836-7jqw-3684
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:59
Modified
2024-11-26 16:16
Summary
Libextractor multiple heap-based buffer overflows
Details
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Libextractor 0.5.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) the asf_read_header function in the ASF plugin (plugins/asfextractor.c), and (2) the parse_trak_atom function in the QT plugin (plugins/qtextractor.c).
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "extractor" }, "versions": [ "0.5" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-2458" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-22T20:15:58Z", "nvd_published_at": "2006-05-18T23:02:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Libextractor 0.5.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) the asf_read_header function in the ASF plugin (plugins/asfextractor.c), and (2) the parse_trak_atom function in the QT plugin (plugins/qtextractor.c).", "id": "GHSA-f836-7jqw-3684", "modified": "2024-11-26T16:16:44Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:59:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2458" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26531" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26532" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/extractor/PYSEC-2006-4.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gnunet.org/libextractor" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1081" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200605-14.xml" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [], "summary": "Libextractor multiple heap-based buffer overflows" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.