ghsa-f7wf-fgwg-64px
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:07
Modified
2022-05-14 02:07
Severity ?
Details
wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-7744" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-01-22T15:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack.", "id": "GHSA-f7wf-fgwg-64px", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:07:50Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:07:50Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7744" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://people.redhat.com/~fweimer/rsa-crt-leaks.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://securityblog.redhat.com/2015/09/02/factoring-rsa-keys-with-tls-perfect-forward-secrecy" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://wolfssl.com/wolfSSL/Blog/Entries/2015/9/17_Two_Vulnerabilities_Recently_Found%2C_An_Attack_on_RSA_using_CRT_and_DoS_Vulnerability_With_DTLS.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00015.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00016.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wolfssl.com/wolfSSL/Docs-wolfssl-changelog.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2016-2367955.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034708" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.