ghsa-f7rp-3ppx-hhqw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:44
Modified
2022-05-17 05:44
Details

The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-2522"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-07-13T17:30:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message.",
  "id": "GHSA-f7rp-3ppx-hhqw",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:44:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:44:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2522"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.