ghsa-f7qg-xj45-w956
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-15 20:31
Modified
2025-09-22 15:49
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Ghost vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via oEmbed Bookmark
Details

Impact

A vulnerability in Ghost's oEmbed mechanism allows staff users to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF.

Vulnerable versions

This vulnerability is present in Ghost v5.99.0 to v5.130.3 to and Ghost v6.0.0 to v6.0.8.

Patches

v5.130.4 and v6.0.9 contain a fix for this issue.

References

The original report is available here: https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida

We thank Cristian Vargas for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability responsibly.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@ghost.org.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.0.8"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "ghost"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.0.9"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.130.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "ghost"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.99.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.130.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-9862"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-15T20:31:14Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-17T15:15:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nA vulnerability in Ghost\u0027s oEmbed mechanism allows staff users to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF.\n\n### Vulnerable versions\n\nThis vulnerability is present in Ghost v5.99.0 to v5.130.3 to and Ghost v6.0.0 to v6.0.8.\n\n### Patches\n\nv5.130.4 and v6.0.9 contain a fix for this issue.\n\n### References\n\nThe original report is available here: https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida\n\nWe thank Cristian Vargas for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability responsibly. \n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at [security@ghost.org](mailto:security@ghost.org).",
  "id": "GHSA-f7qg-xj45-w956",
  "modified": "2025-09-22T15:49:29Z",
  "published": "2025-09-15T20:31:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/security/advisories/GHSA-f7qg-xj45-w956"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9862"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/01d64c7c0ffbf90cd036195c60ded6d08077d612"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/ffe9d079afa68557c581d224f1ff126e625b06e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/regida"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/releases/tag/v6.0.9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Ghost vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via oEmbed Bookmark"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.