ghsa-f78m-3xxg-82w8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:37
Modified
2022-05-02 03:37
Details

Buffer overflow in the SIEVE script component (sieve/script.c), as used in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.13 and 2.3.14, and Dovecot 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.7, allows local users to execute arbitrary code and read or modify arbitrary messages via a crafted SIEVE script, related to the incorrect use of the sizeof operator for determining buffer length, combined with an integer signedness error.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2632"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-08T23:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the SIEVE script component (sieve/script.c), as used in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.13 and 2.3.14, and Dovecot 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.7, allows local users to execute arbitrary code and read or modify arbitrary messages via a crafted SIEVE script, related to the incorrect use of the sizeof operator for determining buffer length, combined with an integer signedness error.",
  "id": "GHSA-f78m-3xxg-82w8",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:37:11Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:37:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2632"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sieve/script.c.diff?r1=1.62\u0026r2=1.62.2.1\u0026only_with_tag=cyrus-imapd-2_2-tail"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/cyrus-cvs/2009-September/001253.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/cyrus-cvs/2009-September/001254.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-September/msg00491.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2009-September/000135.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Mar/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-10/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36629"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36632"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36698"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36713"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36904"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4077"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1881"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/09/14/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/58103"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36296"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36377"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-838-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2559"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2641"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.