ghsa-f69j-274h-2m7w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:55
Modified
2022-05-01 23:55
Details
** DISPUTED ** Memory leak in Pidgin 2.0.0, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via malformed XML documents. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor, who states: "I was never able to identify a scenario under which a problem occurred and the original reporter wasn't able to supply any sort of reproduction details."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-2956" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-01T22:41:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "** DISPUTED ** Memory leak in Pidgin 2.0.0, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via malformed XML documents. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the upstream vendor, who states: \"I was never able to identify a scenario under which a problem occurred and the original reporter wasn\u0027t able to supply any sort of reproduction details.\"", "id": "GHSA-f69j-274h-2m7w", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:55:07Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:55:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2956" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2956" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453739" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-2647" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://crisp.cs.du.edu/?q=ca2007-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0246" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/06/27/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/495165/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29985" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.