ghsa-f4fw-rj48-wj4q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:39
Modified
2025-04-11 04:04
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wlcms-plugin.php in the White Label CMS plugin before 1.5.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the developer name via the wlcms_o_developer_name parameter in a save action to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by a developer name containing XSS sequences.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-5387" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-10-24T17:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wlcms-plugin.php in the White Label CMS plugin before 1.5.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the developer name via the wlcms_o_developer_name parameter in a save action to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by a developer name containing XSS sequences.", "id": "GHSA-f4fw-rj48-wj4q", "modified": "2025-04-11T04:04:19Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:39:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79520" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/86568" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/117590/White-Label-CMS-1.5-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery-Cross-Site-Scripting.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/white-label-cms/changelog" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/22156" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56166" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…