ghsa-cvjh-v93q-8c36
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:22
Modified
2022-05-13 01:22
Severity ?
Details
Incorrect pointer management in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-5764", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-02-19T17:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Incorrect pointer management in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.", id: "GHSA-cvjh-v93q-8c36", modified: "2022-05-13T01:22:33Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:22:33Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5764", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0309", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://crbug.com/913246", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JVFHYCJGMZQUKYSIE2BXE4NLEGFGUXU5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZQOP53LXXPRGD4N5OBKGQTSMFXT32LF6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4395", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106767", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.