ghsa-cvc4-qjwp-hwhc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:49
Modified
2022-05-14 03:49
Severity ?
Details
Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently read arbitrary files via the use of the .libfile operator in a crafted postscript document.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-7977" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-05-23T04:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently read arbitrary files via the use of the .libfile operator in a crafted postscript document.", "id": "GHSA-cvc4-qjwp-hwhc", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:49:12Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:49:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7977" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697169" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://ghostscript.com/doc/9.21/History9.htm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-31" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015ef70" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/29/28" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/05/15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95334" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.